2,450+
personnel deployed through UNDP’s roster
2024 roster activity reported by UNDP in December 2024, supporting over 150 UNDP offices.
UNDP’s account in the World Economic ForumUnderstand competencies, examine teams and leaders, plan future demand and compare talent options. Choose the scope your decision needs, then connect agreed steps through automation and approvals.
Start with the EVA capability your question needs, including planning or matching directly.
Start with the people, documents and existing records relevant to your question.
Examine patterns and gaps while keeping employee, manager and AI-derived inputs distinguishable.
Inform deployment, development, recruitment and planning. Add approvals and connected actions where needed.
See the capabilities you have and the workforce choices they support.
Build a shared picture of your workforce’s competencies. Compare perspectives and evidence to identify where to deploy expertise, strengthen capability or recruit for the work ahead.
Combine the sources your scope needs. Keep reported competencies, assessment perspectives and AI inferences clearly labelled.
EVA conducts participant conversations. EVA SuperBot helps administrators set up campaigns.
Managed project: $16,000 for up to 300 people. Board-ready analysis in less than 10 weeks, guaranteed.
Compare mapping optionsChoose a Self-Service, Managed or wider mapping example. Illustrative analytics using synthetic data.
Turn employee and manager assessments into clear development priorities.
Proficiency distributions, assessment differences, development priorities and an investment map.
EVA Competency Mapping · Managed
Question: Where should this team's development effort go?
Inputs: An agreed competency framework, employee assessments and manager assessments.
This Managed example uses a synthetic cohort across several markets. Your included population, language and analyses are agreed in the project scope; later reassessment is a separate option. This interpreted readout does not define the automated outputs included in Self-Service.
Build and maintain a shared competency map across departments, countries and populations. Bring together existing information, conversational evidence and the review process your organisation needs, as a wider project or a recurring programme.
Keep self-declared competencies, document-based inferences and assessment evidence distinguishable so reviewers can understand the basis of each result.
Your proposal confirms the information sources, assessment and review process, analytics, update schedule and delivery support included in your programme.
Get a quotation for wider or recurring mappingDifferent perspectives, held together
Illustrative capability modelUnderstand the patterns behind team performance.
EVA Team & Leadership Analytics brings the relevant assessment and survey instruments into one analysis. Examine leadership alignment, team experience, development priorities or time allocation. Commission a specific analysis or agree a recurring programme.
Compare self, manager and team assessments. Explore alignment gaps, individual debriefs and development actions for the leadership population in scope.
Connect competencies and development wishes with engagement or collaboration questions. The boutique sample adds selling styles and product knowledge for a retail context.
Examine time allocation by activity, market, channel and role. Use scenarios to explore how the balance of work could change.
Choose the population, instruments, languages and output. Use the findings to focus a calibration discussion, a coaching priority or a team action. Agree any repeat campaign or refresh cadence explicitly.
Questions your evidence can support
Use campaign evidence where available. Additional questions, perspectives and analyses are agreed in your scope.
Illustrative analytics using synthetic data.
Bring self, manager and team perspectives into one leadership and succession review.
Three-view comparisons, development themes, successor readiness and individual debrief views.
EVA Team & Leadership Analytics
Question: Where do leadership perspectives differ, and what needs a calibration discussion?
Inputs: Self, line-manager and team assessments, with manager-provided performance and potential inputs where agreed.
Instruments, respondent groups, confidentiality, calibration and debrief support are scoped for the project.
Current capability and future demand
Illustrative capability modelBring future demand into the capability picture.
EVA Workforce Planning compares the capability available with the work ahead. Start from manager forecasts or examine demand derived from business plans, then review development, movement and hiring options with the people accountable for delivery.
Gather the competencies each unit expects to need, the timing, urgency and reasons they may be hard to find. Read those requirements against the current bench.
Trace interpreted requirements back to passages in the source plans. Examine demand and supply across business groups, functions and countries.
Explore geographic and competency coverage, gaps and the effect of missing information. Review the assumptions before choosing an action.
Compare contractors, internal moves, existing applicants and development options with EVA Talent Matching. Check availability, release and development time against the plan. Agree whether you need a snapshot or a recurring programme.
Illustrative analytics using synthetic data.
Bring managers' future competency needs, timing and vacancy forecasts into one view.
Demand, urgency and scarcity analysis, forecast vacancies and development, movement or hiring options.
EVA Workforce Planning
Question: What capability will we need, when, and where might it be hard to find?
Inputs: Manager forecasts and assumptions, with current capability data for bench comparisons.
A manager-led forecast. Timing, population, current-capability inputs and any repeat cycle are agreed separately.
Requirements meet relevant evidence
Illustrative capability modelSee who fits the work, and what to do next.
Compare contractors, internal people and existing applicants against the same role, or explore who could develop towards it. EVA Talent Matching turns your request into criteria and weights you can review, with the reasons behind each comparison.
Start from a requisition, ask in ordinary language, choose a saved question or write structured criteria. For example: who could manage our travel-retail accounts in Asia?
Check what the role requires, what is preferred and how much each preference counts. Keep required conditions separate from weighted preferences, and decide how missing evidence is handled.
Open the scorecard to inspect each criterion, its weight and the supporting evidence. See what is met, what is not met and what is not yet evidenced.
If nobody meets the requirement, compare another talent pool or examine development options. Review interest, timing and any release or contracting needs before deciding what happens next.
Try one role across four strategies. Change the preference weights and inspect each scorecard. Synthetic data.
Compare contract, redeployment, recruitment and development options for one role.
Four strategy views, adjustable preference weights, ranked comparisons and individual scorecards showing met, not met and not evidenced criteria.
EVA Talent Matching
Question: Who could fill the role, why, and what could we do if nobody meets the requirement?
Inputs: Synthetic role requirements, employee, contractor and applicant records, with criterion-level evidence and availability.
An interactive illustration with fictional people and a simplified scoring model. It explains the comparison, rather than connecting to a live EVA workspace. Your criteria, sources, controls and delivery are agreed in scope.
Connected capabilities, with human review
Illustrative capability modelConnect workforce capabilities, approvals and workflows across the organisation.
Coordinate workforce requests, reviews and approved actions across the systems you already use. Bring the right evidence to each reviewer, send reminders when a step needs attention, and track the outcome through to completion.
EVA Talent Matching helps identify suitable people and explain their fit. This platform coordinates the reviews, approvals, release and follow-up that turn that comparison into an agreed action.
Agree the stages, reviewers and automated actions around your organisation’s process.
Describe the assignment, attach the terms of reference and identify the people who need to review it.
Route the request to the relevant managers, specialists and budget holders in their own views.
Compare people against agreed criteria. Review match explanations alongside panel scores and comments.
Confirm interest, availability and supervisor release. Record the authorised decision before the assignment proceeds.
Track assignment dates and status, send configured reminders and request an evaluation when the work ends.
Give managers, specialists, budget holders and committees the views and actions their responsibilities require. Record reviews and approvals against the request.
Use weighted criteria, panel scores and comments alongside evidence-based match explanations. Review the reasons behind each comparison before deciding.
Give people a clear view of their applications and assignments, while operators follow the review stages and actions relevant to their role.
Configure reminders, scheduled updates and escalation routes. Bring stalled steps and exceptions to the responsible person for review.
Connect agreed people records, documents and reporting flows. Define which system owns each record and how updates move between them.
Your administrators can manage agreed workflow rules with guidance from EVA’s forward deployed engineering team. Scope setup, training and ongoing support around your organisation.
personnel deployed through UNDP’s roster
2024 roster activity reported by UNDP in December 2024, supporting over 150 UNDP offices.
UNDP’s account in the World Economic ForumA documented deployment process
UNDP’s guidance describes EVA deployment requests, candidate scoring, vetting, status tracking and post-assignment evaluations.
Read UNDP’s deployment guidanceRecognised in UNDP’s published strategy
People for 2030 identifies EVA.ai’s role in matching profiles for leadership positions and supporting mobility.
UNDP People for 2030 strategy, 2025Start directly with the process you need. We agree the capabilities, connections and delivery support around it.
Pricing on request for the agreed platform and delivery scope.
Start with a specific analysis or a wider requirement. We agree the population, inputs, deliverables and any repeat campaigns or connected workflows before quoting. You can discuss planning or matching directly.
Choose how to start and discuss your scope →"EVA.ai has been instrumental in revolutionising how the UNDP approaches talent management and operational efficiency for our global workforce of about 23,000 personnel. By enabling a detailed map of expertise and skills across our organisation, EVA.ai has empowered us to identify talent gaps, enable crisis response deployments, assist in rolling out our mobility policy, manage leadership pools, and support various initiatives. Building on this success, the new Internal Talent Marketplace leverages EVA.ai to identify and flag relevant vacancies to personnel automatically."
8 questions to explore
For Self-Service, use your competency framework or create one with EVA SuperBot; we confirm compatibility before activation. For Managed, use your framework or agree a first version with EVA for the team and decision in scope. Employee and manager input then share that agreed frame.
See scope and pricingYou might also want to know
Competencies
What is a skills taxonomy? Compare it with a competency framework and skills matrix, and learn how to use each for workforce and development decisions.
Team analytics
Read the population, coverage, perspective and date before deciding what a workforce chart means.
Workforce planning
Connect business plans and manager forecasts to capability, capacity, timing and possible responses.
Talent matching
Separate essential requirements, preferences and missing evidence before comparing people.
Workflows
Understand the conditions, system updates, approvals and exceptions behind a reliable automated process.
Integrations
Agree record ownership, identifiers, update direction and recovery before connecting a workforce process.
Bring the requirement, the people or records in scope and your deadline. We will work through the information, capabilities and next steps it needs.