Sample analysis · Illustrative · Synthetic data · Fictional house · No real client data
ML

Maison Lumière · Competency Analysis, one cohort Sample

Client Marketing · 0 people · 9 markets · 12 competencies in 4 pillars · employee and manager assessments · use the filters or click a person

EVA.ai · Competency Mapping
Discuss this analysis with BenBen KaminskyBen's Calendar
people in view 0 of 0

The framework

Four pillars, twelve competencies, four levels

Levels: 1 Developing · 2 Practicing · 3 Advanced · 4 Mastery. Every person rated themselves in conversation with EVA; their manager rated them independently. The headline finding is where the two views differ.

Key results

The cohort at a glance

·
average manager-rated level (out of 4)
·
average self-rated level
·
of people rate themselves above their manager
·
widest gap
·
strongest competency, manager view
·
people without a manager view yet

Three decisions this analysis puts on the table

Computed from the people in view. Each one names an owner and a 90-day test.

Chart 1 · The hero

Self against manager, competency by competency

What was asked: each person rated the twelve competencies with an example from the work; each manager rated the same person on the same scale without seeing the self rating.
SelfManagerRight-hand figure: gap, self minus manager
Section 2

Where the gap lives: seniority and tenure

By seniority

SelfManager

By tenure, manager view and gap

Manager-rated levelGap, self minus manager
Section 3

Competency by market

Self against manager, by market

Gap within 20%20 to 40%Over 40%Bubble = people · dashed line = self equals manager

Manager-rated level by market and pillar

Average manager rating, 1 to 4. Markets with fewer than 4 participants are indicative only.
Section 4

Individual calibration map

Each row is one colleague (anonymised); each cell is self minus manager for one competency. Red = self above manager; blue = manager above self; pale = aligned. Click a row for the person's profile.

Section 5

What the team wants to develop, against the evidence

The development wish-list

Votes = people naming the competency among their top three.

The investment map: demand against evidence

Across: manager-rated level · Up: votes to develop · Top-left = invest now
Section 6

In their own words

Section 7

People in view

How to read a profile

Click any person to open their profile on the right: the twelve competencies as a radar (self against manager), the gap, what they asked to develop, and what the manager does with it. This sample uses synthetic individual profiles. EVA and Customer Success configure role-based access for each client and use case. Employees, managers, HR and other authorised viewers can see individual assessments and aggregate analyses according to the agreed permissions.

Next 90 days

From the analysis to the decisions

Weeks 1 to 4

Calibrate

  • Every person with a gap above 0.5 gets the manager's view in a private conversation, with the examples on the table.
  • Markets above 30% gap run a manager calibration session; agree a reference after reviewing the current evidence.
Weeks 5 to 8

Fund the three

  • One cohort each on the three competencies where demand meets deficit, taught by the cohort's own Advanced and Mastery people.
  • Development plans written with the person, one observable behaviour and a date.
  • Stakeholder and storytelling requests folded into the commercial cohort.
Weeks 9 to 12

Measure again

  • Re-run the manager view only; the gap is the number that moves first.
  • Publish the Quality and Client Intimacy experts as the coaching bench.
  • Take the picture to the next cohort on the same workspace.

Explore what this analysis could tell you about your team.

Click Here to Book a Scoping Meeting with Ben