Know who wants to contribute, and to what. Decide who to introduce.
EVA is an AI agent that talks to members and volunteers about experience, interests and availability, joins the answers to your open opportunities, and shows where every finding comes from.
EVA provides evidence and recommendations. Your people make the decisions.
Live within the United Nations and LVMH, across 120+ countries.
Who could contribute to this role, event or mentoring programme?
A large membership list is not a current pool of willing contributors. EVA maps what people can do and shows the evidence. Here the people are your members and volunteers, and the evidence is what they want to do and when. Interests change, availability is uneven and a qualification does not establish suitability for every role.
Refresh interests, review introductions and follow through.
Start with real opportunities and a coordinator.
Agree the member or volunteer cohort, role requirements and coordinator. Start with mentoring, expert panels, events or trained volunteer services.
Refresh expertise, interest and availability.
Scope conversations around relevant experience, the contribution people want to make and the time they can offer. Add training or qualification records from agreed sources. Participation and a preference not to volunteer should remain explicit.
Review introductions and follow through.
Compare the evidence with an actual opportunity and invite coordinator review. Confirm mutual interest and any mandatory checks before an introduction or assignment. Record acceptance, completion and feedback separately, then use that learning in the next review.
See a proposed introduction and what needs confirming.
Review the dated accounts, the checks still open and the person responsible for the next action.
| Member or volunteer | What they said (date) | Opportunity | Checks and status |
|---|---|---|---|
| V-024 · Experienced member | Offers two mentoring sessions a month; wants early-career mentees (confirmed 20 Sep) | Mentoring: early-career member in the same specialism, requested 18 Sep | Mutual interest to confirm; coordinator makes the introduction |
| V-011 · Member mentor | Completed a six-session mentoring cycle (mentee feedback 2 Sep) | Next cycle | Asked whether to continue; answer recorded |
| V-067 · Event volunteer | Availability last confirmed in March | Event support, 14 Nov | Recheck interest and training currency before asking |
| V-102 · Specialist contributor | Willing to sit on a panel; discloses a conflict | Expert panel, October | Authorised owner resolves the conflict before invitation |
Keep participation voluntary and role checks clear.
Taking part never costs the member
The organisation funds the programme. No member or volunteer pays for a profile, and a preference not to be asked is recorded and respected.
Interest is separate from membership
Being a member does not imply availability or consent to every opportunity. Keep preferences current and make a decline easy to record.
Keep safeguarding and suitability checks with your team
Safeguarding, licensing and conflicts need their authorised processes. A conversation or completed profile does not clear a person for a regulated role.
Start with one mentoring or volunteering programme.
Bring one recurring programme, its opportunities and the coordinator who makes introductions. Agree a refresh that shows who wants to contribute and to what, who is available now, introductions for review and contributions completed.
Proposed application. Delivery, language coverage and connections are agreed in scope.
Connect employees with partner charities’ opportunities.
A company running a skills-based volunteering programme can use the same approach with its employees: refresh what they want to contribute and review matches to partner charities’ opportunities.
Ask us about programme termsDoes a current picture of members fill more opportunities?
Compare coordination effort with accepted introductions and completed contributions. Keep current willingness, role checks and mutual interest separate from the size of the membership list.
Coordinator effort
Record time spent updating records, checking interest and arranging introductions.
Current-response coverage
Count people with current interests and availability, separately from total membership.
Accepted introductions
Track introductions accepted by both sides after the required checks.
Completed contributions
Confirm completed activity and follow-up separately from an accepted introduction.
Measures are agreed with you against your baseline; they are not promised results.
- Decision owner
- Head of volunteering or member services answers for the programme's participation and outcomes.
- Working lead
- Programme coordinator makes the introductions and follows them through.
- Review and control partners
- Safeguarding, licensing and data owners approve each check and the access rules.
Questions before you start.
3 questions to explore
What would a first programme trial involve?
Start with one programme, its opportunities and the coordinator who makes introductions. Scope a refresh for an agreed cohort, with coordinators reviewing mutual interest and required checks. Compare coordinator effort and completed contributions with the previous cycle.
You might also want to know
Where this connects.
Surge & Emergency Rosters
For volunteers who deploy: readiness with a timestamp.
Explore this decision →End of Assignment
Feedback after each contribution, so the next introduction is better informed.
Explore this decision →Competency Mapping
The evidence record underneath every EVA conversation.
Explore this decision →Discuss the opportunities your programme needs to fill.
Use the call to describe one mentoring or volunteering programme, the people involved and what a useful first output would look like. No personal records are needed.